Evidence of religious practices dating back to the early days of King
David and the Kingdom of Judah have been discovered at excavations run
by the Israel Antiquities Authority in Tel Motza, west of Jerusalem.
According to the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the finds --
which include 2,750-year-old pottery figurines of men and horses --
provide rare evidence of a ritual cult at the beginning of the period of the monarchy.
Do you work in manufacturing or retail? What will you do if you are
furloughed or laid off from your job because there is no work as a
result of the resources and products you need sitting idle in port?
Have you been saving for just such an emergency? Can you pay your bills
even if you are out of work for a while? Remember you won’t be eligible
for unemployment benefits until you are out of work for as long as 30
days. Even then the benefit usually only covers 60% of the pay you are
accustomed to – that’s just over half – and you may still have to pay
taxes on it!
The fact is most of us are not saving and preparing for hard times. Will
you just throw your hands up and accept whatever fate awaits you? I
don’t recommend it. Waiting in line for FEMA handouts – if there are any
FEMA handouts, is no fun. Set money aside for hard times. Do what your
grandparents did: Save your money – even if it means doing without the
cool toys that many of us have come to believe are necessities.
Forward- personal note from Bob Barney- This is one of the first TV shows from Garner Ted Armstrong that I remember watching (the byline shows 1977, but it should be originally around 1975, probably updated.) His style and basic facts amazed me. I started listening to Ted in 1975 on the radio. For several days I did not realize he was a minister. I was an atheist and ministers turned me off, and when Ted said that "once in a while I admit to being an evangelist," I turned off the radio and would not listen to him for days... However the message was just too hard to ignore. I started listening again..... Here is one of these episodes, and I think his style and message is unique.....
I am not sure where I come down on this subject, but this is a true story... The US did do this! What else are they doing??? This is an interesting subject. One of the leading proponets of CHEMTRAILS is Alex Jones...
Diagram depicting antibiotic resistance through alteration of the antibiotic's target site, modeled after MRSA's resistance to penicillin. Beta-lactam antibiotics permanently inactivate PBP enzymes, which are essential for bacterial life, by permanently binding to their active sites. MRSA, however, expresses a PBP that will not allow the antibiotic into its active site. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
A new strain of MRSA has been found in British milk, indicating that
the superbug is spreading through the livestock population and poses a
growing threat to human health.
The new strain, MRSA ST398, has been identified in seven samples of bulk milk from five different farms in England.
The
discovery, from tests on 1,500 samples, indicates that
antibiotic-resistant organisms are gaining an increasing hold in the
dairy industry.
The disclosure comes amid growing concern over the
use of modern antibiotics on British farms, driven by price pressure
imposed by the big supermarket chains. Intensive farming with thousands
of animals raised in cramped conditions means infections spread faster
and the need for antibiotics is consequently greater.
Three
classes of antibiotics rated as “critically important to human medicine”
by the World Health Organisation – cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and
macrolides – have increased in use in the animal population by
eightfold in the last decade.
He single-handedly delivered the swing vote to approve Obamacare and
perhaps even crushed the American health system that has been the envy
of the world.
WND has selected U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. for its first-ever Benedict Arnold Award.
“There are lots of bad guys out there who would qualify as ‘Villain
of the Year,’ but precious few candidates for the ‘Benedict Arnold
Award,’” explained WND Vice President and Managing Editor David
Kupelian. “Benedict Arnold, after all, was a good guy; he was an
American general in the Revolutionary War who fought valiantly on behalf
of the Continental Army – that is, until, for reasons yet unknown, he
defected to the British side and betrayed the cause he had formerly
served.”
Kupelian added, “That pretty much describes Justice Roberts, who
gained the enthusiastic support of conservatives and other
Constitution-lovers by virtue of his earlier rulings and judicial
temperament, and yet betrayed that trust in a devastating way. And we
still don’t know why he did it.”
Benedict Arnold
On June 28, 2012, Roberts joined the left of the Court in a dramatic
5-4 decision to uphold President Obama’s signature legislation. The
Court ruled that Obamacare’s individual mandate is not constitutional
under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause, but is reasonably considered a
tax valid under Congress’ authority to “lay and collect taxes.”
“The Affordable Care Act is constitutional in part and
unconstitutional in part. The individual mandate cannot be upheld as an
exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause,” Roberts wrote.
“That Clause authorizes Congress to regulate interstate commerce, not to
order individuals to engage it. In this case, however, it is reasonable
to construe what Congress has done as increasing taxes on those who
have a certain amount of income, but choose to go without health
insurance. Such legislation is within Congress’s power to tax.”
As a result of that decision, the penalties Americans are required to
pay under Obamacare for going without health insurance were declared
constitutional, and it all hinged on Roberts’ assertion that the
assessments are taxes.
The court’s four left-leaning justices – Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader
Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor – sided with Roberts, who was
appointed to the court by President George W. Bush.
Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented.
While driving into D.C. last week, I was listening to Rush Limbaugh
expound on an important issue that I don’t believe many pro-liberty
people give much thought to. He said that “low-information” voters
present a serious problem because there is no way to reach people who
are uninformed. Worse, most of these people don’t like conservatives or
libertarians.
No doubt about it, Rush has zeroed in on the crux of the problem when
it comes to the decline and fall of the American Empire. How in the
world do you reach people who not only are devoid of knowledge, but, in
addition, don’t like the very people who have the information they so
desperately need?
Does anyone really believe that John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Mitt
Romney, John McCain, Orrin Hatch, Mitch McConnell, or Jeb Bush (yes,
he’s coming!) – to name but a handful of high-profile establishment
Republicans – is fighting for a totally free market or something even
close to individual liberty?
Ditto some of the best-known media pundits who are, appallingly,
labeled arch-conservatives by both their peers and enemies – people like
Bill Kristol, Ann Coulter, Ben Stein and Bill Bennett.
And why not? Even Fox News, which started out as an alternative to
the radical left-wing media, has drifted increasingly to the left. Why
do you think they were willing to part ways with Glenn Beck and his huge
ratings? Or, just as shockingly, with Judge Andrew Napolitano, another
libertarian, who, to the displeasure of Roger Ailes, used his show as a
platform to preach anti-government gospel. Who’s next – John Stossel?
English: Statue of St Joseph of Arimathea, west from of Glastonbury parish church (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I know that many readers will not believe these myths, but regardless, we should know them! However before you reject this fable, understand that this "fable" is AT LEAST 1700 years old. Many church fathers retold this story. The Queen of England accepts this story... So tell me, why doesn't Hollywood make this story? Why aren't these fables recounted? Is it that Satan does not want us to know who we really are? I think it is.
Written by “Jack” (author of the
“Straight Talking
About God” website),
with contributions from Dr Gene Scott PhD, Dr Brian Mackenzie-Hanson
BA (Hons), DD,
E. Raymond Capt
(author of “Traditions of Glastonbury”),
Lionel Smithett
Lewis (Glastonbury Vicar and author of “St. Joseph of Arimathea at
Glastonbury”) and
Andrew Gray (author of “The Origin and Early History of Christianity in
Britain”).
The Link with England
Historic writings support the belief
that in 37 A.D. Christ’s great uncle, St Joseph of
Arimathea,
and followed by the apostle St Simon Zelotes, and later by St
Paul of
Tarsus with
other disciples (according to the Pseudo-Pauline apocrypha: “Acts 29” -
from the Sonnini manuscript, on hearing of Jewish Christians settling in
Britain, Paul of Tarsus travelled there via Spain from Rome, this is a
disputed text but still in
antiquity), came to Britannia, to erect
the first Christian Church outside Jerusalem, there has been a Church of England
(Britannia) ever since
although it’s affiliations, allegiances and doctrines have been moderated and
switched between Rome and England several times throughout its history:
(i.e.
First Christian Church in Britain 37 AD, Martyrdom of St. Simon Zelotes “Bishop of the Britons” 44 A.D.,
Silurian battles against Romans 52 - 53 A.D., Suetonius Paulinus attacks Western
Britons and Druidic and Christian centres of learning 59 - 62 A.D., Boudicea (Iceni)
Rebellion 61 - 63 A.D., Phagan and Deruvian mission 167 A.D., King Lucius became
Christian 170 A.D., St Alban - Martyred 209 A.D., Constantine proclaimed Emperor
at York 306 A.D., three British Bishops attend the Synod of Arles 314 A.D.,
Early Arianism 319 - 586 A.D., St Augustine 597 A.D., Synod of Whitby 664 A.D.,
Great Schism 1054 (concluded 1472), Lombardy 1061, Norman Conquest 1066, Ecclesia
Scotticana 1218, Ecclesia Anglicana 1246, Schism (Western Church) 1378 -
1417, John
Clerk 1521, Henrician
Schism (Reformation) 1534, BsCP 1549 and 1552, 42 Articles of Faith 1553,
39 Articles of Faith 1563, Second Schism (Anglicanism independent of Rome) 1570,
Puritan abolition of Anglicanism 1649 - 1660, BCP 1662, Arian Movement (Church
of England) 1707 - 1747, Catholic Relief Act 1778, Oxford Movement 1833 - 1845,
2nd Vatican Council 1962 - 65);
The fact that there are records of Christian
centres of learning in Britannia, during the Roman persecutions, of three British
Bishops from:
York, London and probably Lincoln, were recorded
as being present at the Council of Arles in 314 AD proves that there was
already an established Church in Britannia at this time and as this pre-dates
the Roman Catholic heresy the early Church of England had its origins in
original Catholicism. Therefore the pre-664 AD Church in Britannia had to
be Arian in Christological belief!
Christianity in
Britannia began during the first century and existed autonomously,
independent of the Church of Rome until the Synod of Whitby in the
middle ages. Although Anglicanism fell victim to Roman heresy, be it
amid
protest, the Arian Catholic Church has declared that Anglican and
Anglican
Catholic ordinations will be recognised in principle for clergy wishing
to
repent of their heresy and convert to the Arian Catholic Church.
HANOVER, N.H. (AP) — You know Dasher and Dancer and the rest of the gang. But do you recall, the most “Perfect Christmas Crowd-Bringer” of all?
That’s how executives at Montgomery Ward originally described Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, who first appeared in a 1939 book written by one of the company’s advertising copywriter and given free to children as a way to drive traffic to the stores.
Peter Carini holds a first edition of "Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer", part of a special collection at Dartmouth College, on Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2011 in Hanover, N.H. (AP Photo/Toby Talbot)
Curious to know more about how Rudolph really went down in history? It’s all in the pages of a long-overlooked scrapbook compiled by the story’s author, Robert L. May, and housed at his alma mater, Dartmouth College.
May donated his hand-written first draft and illustrated mock-up to Dartmouth before his death at age 71 in 1976, and his family later added to what has become a large collection of Rudolph-related documents and merchandise, including a life-sized papier-mache reindeer that now stands among the stacks at the Rauner Special Collections Library.
But May‘s scrapbook about the book’s launch and success went unnoticed until last year, when Dartmouth archivist Peter Carini came across it while looking for something else.
“No one on staff currently knew we had it. I pulled it out and all the pieces started falling out. It was just a mess,” Carini said.
The scrapbook, which has since been restored and cataloged, includes May‘s list of possible names for his story’s title character – from Rodney and Rollo to Reginald and Romeo. There’s a map showing how many books went to each state and letters of praise from adults and children alike. MORE>>>>>>>>
On December 25, Christians around the world will gather to celebrate Jesus’ birth. Joyful carols, special liturgies, brightly wrapped gifts, festive foods—these all characterize the feast today, at least in the northern hemisphere. But just how did the Christmas festival originate? How did December 25 come to be associated with Jesus’ birthday?
The Bible offers few clues: Celebrations of Jesus’ Nativity are not mentioned in the Gospels or Acts; the date is not given, not even the time of year. The biblical reference to shepherds tending their flocks at night when they hear the news of Jesus’ birth (Luke 2:8) might suggest the spring lambing season; in the cold month of December, on the other hand, sheep might well have been corralled. Yet most scholars would urge caution about extracting such a precise but incidental detail from a narrative whose focus is theological rather than calendrical.
In the early 17th century, a wave of religious reform changed the way Christmas was celebrated in Europe. When Oliver Cromwell and his Puritan forces took over England in 1645, they vowed to rid England of decadence and, as part of their effort, cancelled Christmas. By popular demand, Charles II was restored to the throne and, with him, came the return of the popular holiday.
The pilgrims, English separatists that came to America in 1620, were even more orthodox in their Puritan beliefs than Cromwell. As a result, Christmas was not a holiday in early America. From 1659 to 1681, the celebration of Christmas was actually outlawed in Boston. Anyone exhibiting the Christmas spirit was fined five shillings. By contrast, in the Jamestown settlement, Captain John Smith reported that Christmas was enjoyed by all and passed without incident.
After the American Revolution, English customs fell out of favor, including Christmas. In fact, Congress was in session on December 25, 1789, the first Christmas under America’s new constitution. Christmas wasn’t declared a federal holiday until June 26, 1870.
Lucas Oil produces and markets 350 oil and lubrication products in 26
countries. It has headquarters in California and a plant in Corydon,
Ind.
As for racing, Lucas Oil sponsors more than 700 race teams, drivers and events. It owns television network MAVTV.
The company started humbly, founded in 1989 by Lucas, who grew up in Southern Indiana and was a long-haul trucker at the time.
He started alone, selling items out of the back of one of those trucks.
Today,
he has more than 400 employees. While the private company doesn't
reveal its sales or profit, it has been reported Lucas Oil revenues are
$150 million annually.
The company uses its involvement in motor
racing to research, market and develop its products while generating
sales through major retail automotive chains, truck stops and independent speed shops throughout the country.
Lucas
hosted a luncheon Friday to let more than 300 visitors to the
international motorsports show know he is committed to the industry.
NASCAR drivers continue to give feedback from testing of the 2013
models, and Ford Racing released a video on Wednesday featuring driver
and technician reaction from the October test session at Talladega as
teams grind toward the season-opening race at Daytona.
The first 'War on Christmas' was declared almost 400 years ago, courtesy of our Puritan forefathers
posted on December 20, 2011, at 12:48 PM
The Pilgrims who came to America in 1620 were strict Puritans who didn't celebrate Christmas: They spent their first Dec. 25th in Plymouth Colony working in the fields as they would on any other day. SEE ALL 12 PHOTOS
How did the first settlers celebrate Christmas? They didn't. The Pilgrims who came to America in 1620 were strict Puritans, with firm views on religious holidays such as Christmas and Easter. Scripture did not name any holiday except the Sabbath, they argued, and the very concept of "holy days" implied that some days were not holy. "They for whom all days are holy can have no holiday," was a common Puritan maxim. Puritans were particularly contemptuous of Christmas, nicknaming it "Foolstide" and banning their flock from any celebration of it throughout the 17th and 18th centuries. On the first Dec. 25 the settlers spent in Plymouth Colony, they worked in the fields as they would on any other day. The next year, a group of non-Puritan workmen caught celebrating Christmas with a game of "stoole-ball" — an early precursor of baseball — were punished by Gov. William Bradford. "My conscience cannot let you play while everybody else is out working," he told them.
Why didn't Puritans like Christmas? They had several reasons, including the fact that it did not originate as a Christian holiday. The upper classes in ancient Rome celebrated Dec. 25 as the birthday of the sun god Mithra. The date fell right in the middle of Saturnalia, a monthlong holiday dedicated to food, drink, and revelry, and Pope Julius I is said to have chosen that day to celebrate Christ's birth as a way of co-opting the pagan rituals. Beyond that, the Puritans considered it historically inaccurate to place the Messiah's arrival on Dec. 25. They thought Jesus had been born sometime in September.
So their objections were theological? Not exclusively. The main reason Puritans didn't like Christmas was that it was a raucously popular holiday in late medieval England. Each year, rich landowners would throw open their doors to the poor and give them food and drink as an act of charity. The poorest man in the parish was named the "Lord of Misrule," and the rich would wait upon him at feasts that often descended into bawdy drunkenness. Such decadence never impressed religious purists. "Men dishonor Christ more in the 12 days of Christmas," wrote the 16th-century clergyman Hugh Latimer, "than in all the 12 months besides."
(Biblical Archaeology Review) In one of the Old Testament’s
colder and more brutal episodes, King Amaziah of Judah (c. 801–783
B.C.), after having slain nearly 10,000 Edomites in battle near the
southern end of the Dead Sea, is said to have thrown another 10,000
captives from the top of nearby Sela, where they were “dashed to
pieces” (2 Chronicles 25:12; 2 Kings 14:7).
While the Biblical account provides only vague clues as to where
this horrible event took place (Sela simply means “rock” in
Hebrew), the archaeology of a little-known mountaintop stronghold in
southern Jordan may hold the answer.
It goes without saying that the mass media lies - they lied about Iraq
in the lead up to a war that in total, killed over 2 million people.
They lied about Libya, they are lying about Syria. They lie about
vaccines and intentionally try to sell parents the idea of purposefully injecting their children with mercury. Their lies have a single purpose - to serve the special interests that hand them their talking points.
Now the mass media is lying about gun violence. The New York Times wrote a particularly outrageous piece titled "In Gun Debate, a Misguided Focus on Mental Illness," where a "medical doctor" is given space to willfully bend statistics to make the case for banning guns, period.
Unfortunately for this "medical doctor" who claims that the vast
majority of the mentally ill do not commit violent acts, the last
several mass shootings in the US were committed by mentally ill
individuals, all confirmed to be on psychotropic medication. Shooter
Adam Lanza was said by relatives to be on Fanapt (Iloperidone) - an anti-psychotic prescribed for people suffering from schizophrenia.
And by day’s end, the world would know who Adam Lanza was.
Lanza kept firing at the children until he heard the sirens. Then he
pulled out one of the Glocks, put it to his head and ended it, knowing
he was on his way to becoming world famous.
Just as Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold of Columbine are famous. Just
as James Holmes, the “Joker” of the Aurora “Dark Knight Rising”
massacre, is famous. Just as Jared Lee Loughner, the Tucson mass
murderer who shot Gabby Giffords, is famous.
A desire to be famous coupled with a dead conscience is the common
thread running through these recurring atrocities. These loners and
losers want us to know who they are. And, to succeed now, each almost
has to outdo in horror those who went before.
Since the news first came in Friday from Newtown, we have argued
about guns in America and mental illness, but heard little about the
moral sickness of our society.
Helen Turner, a self-sufficient 94-year-old from Farmington, brought
her 2004 Subaru Impreza and $100 to the local Midas for a quick oil
change in early October.
She left with a bill for $800 and a warning that she should return to
have the Impreza's fluids changed for an additional $400. The cost, and
additional repairs, were so unexpected that Turner says another
customer gave her a ride home to retrieve her checkbook to pay for them.
"I only had $100 because I only wanted an oil change," she says.
Aside from the $26.99 oil change, Midas charged $297.24 to replace four
spark plugs ($63.13 each in labor costs) and $398.02 ($263.03 for labor)
to replace the valve cover gasket. The extra repairs, minus a $50
discount coupon for the repairs, cost $725.25.
Matthew 2:1-9: Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, "Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him." When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. So they said to him, "In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet: 'But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are not the least among the rulers of Judah; For out of you shall come a Ruler who will shepherd my people Israel.'" Then Herod, when he had secretly called the wise men, determined from them what time the star appeared. And he sent them to Bethlehem and said, "Go and search carefully for the young Child, and when you have found Him, bring back word to me, that I may come and worship Him also." When they heard the king, they departed; and behold, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was. (New King James Version)
There have been many attempts to explain the Christmas Star scientifically, and three ideas will be mentioned here.
There are so many Christmas traditions in the US! Where did they all come from? America is often called a “melting pot” and its Christmas traditions can be seen the same way! It is a country of immigrants from all over the world who each brought their culture’s unique traditions to the New World. Read on to find out how Americans came to celebrate with Santa Claus, stockings, trees, gifts and more!
English: Head of mummy of pharaoh Ramesses III. Русский: Голова мумии фараона Рамсеса III. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
(International Business Times) Researchers have discovered that
the Egyptian pharaoh Ramses III died after his throat was slit.
The pharaoh’s death has been shrouded in mystery and speculation
for centuries; however, a report published Monday in the British
medical journal BMJ suggests that he may, in fact, have been
assassinated by family members, as has often been thought.
ONE of the most beloved stories of traditional literature written by those who support the modern identity of the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel is the story of the coming of the prophet Jeremiah to Ireland. According to this story shortly after c. 586 BCE when Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, conquered Jerusalem, Jeremiah the prophet, accompanied by his scribe Baruch, and the daughters of Zedekiah, the last king of Judah, fled that country and for a short time resided in Egypt. From there they took ship to Ireland, where one of the daughters married Eochaidh the high king (heremon or ard ri) of Ireland. A variation says that the marriage took place in Jerusalem. The royal couple governed the Emerald Isle from their capital at Tara in County Meath. Jeremiah, at that time an old man, was also reputed to have established a sort of ministerial training college at Tara. He became a revered figure in Irish legend.
Over the course of the centuries the royal line established at Tara was transferred from Ireland to Scotland to England where it survives today in the person of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. A wondrous stone, variously called the Stone of Destiny, Stone of Scone, or Coronation Stone, upon which Her Majesty and her predecessors on the thrones of the three kingdoms were crowned, thought to be the stone that the patriarch Jacob slept on at Bethel (Genesis 28:18-22) was also believed to have been brought to Ireland by Jeremiah.
It is claimed that the story of Jeremiah coming to Ireland can be found in the ancient annals, histories and other literature of the Irish, and indeed references to it abound in the works written by traditional Ten Tribes scholars, especially 19th- century writers. Yet rarely, if ever, do these writers point to any specific history in which this tale may be found, vague references to “Irish annals” usually being made. A few examples will suffice:
One authority states that “Irish historians are unanimous that about 580 B.C. there arrived in Ulster a notable man [Jeremiah], a patriarch or saint, accompanied by an Eastern princess, and a lesser person by the name of Simon Brach or Barech”.(I)
Further that, “Irish tradition tells us that Jeremiah married the princess Tamar Tephi to Eochaidh king of Ireland”.(2)
However, the historians are not named, nor is any particular tradition cited.
Another writer says that “The ancient records of Ireland bear ample testimony to this [Jeremiah’s coming to Ireland] as an historic fact, not only recording the event itself, but also supplying confirmatory evidence by giving the actual date or period of their arrival correctly”.(3)
Again, disappointingly, this author does not name the “ancient records” in which the Jeremiah story may be found; rather we read phrases such as, “the records conclude .. .“(4) and “The royal records state .. . “.(5)
He dates the coming of Jeremiah to Ireland at late in 583 BCE or early 582 BCE.
The closest that any writer comes to naming names is a contemporary author and archaeologist, E. Raymond Capt. In his book, Jacob’s Pillar: A Biblical Historical Study, Capt makes reference to The Chronicles of Eri, The Annals of the Kingdom of Ireland by the Four Masters, The Annals of Clonmacnoise, and The Chronicles of Scotland. He quotes briefly from the latter and gives an extensive recounting of the entire Jeremiah legend in his notable book. However, like the learned writers cited above, Capt does not directly cite any passage in any ancient chronicle which explicitly mentions Jeremiah.(6)
This lack of corroboration of the Jeremiah legend has caused some to doubt the validity of the entire story.
But I will show in this article that Jeremiah is mentioned in the Irish annals and histories, albeit under another name. His Judahite ancestry and prophetic identity are clearly stated and even a brief physical description is given. His friend and amanuensis Baruch is also mentioned. Furthermore, I will name names and give the reader of this article the references by which he may corroborate the story himself.
First, however, in order to understand the proper chronological context of Jeremiah’s coming to Ireland, a brief review of Irish history prior to his arrival is necessary.
Recent Comments