« July 2012 | Main | September 2012 »
Posted at 08:46 PM in Bob Barney Commentaries, Religion | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Official portrait of Congressman . (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Paul Ryan’s speech accepting his nomination for the vice presidency of the United States last night has already been widely hailed as a home run national debut by many sources. So it’s no surprise that the Left, which views Ryan’s ideas as the political equivalent of Typhoid Mary, has already pounced on the speech for its alleged inaccuracies, while simultaneously bringing up every conceivable nitpick they can.
In short, according to the Left, Ryan’s speech was a fundamentally, inescapably dishonest argument – a “string of whoppers” and disingenuous statements – made in bad faith for the sake of masking his allegedly plutocratic agenda.
But is this rather unflattering assessment accurate, those who are understandably reluctant to take their ideological opponents’ word on anything must be asking. The answer is no – at least, not entirely. Avik Roy at Forbes, as well as Republican consultant Liz Mair, have already exploded some of the attacks on Ryan’s speech, and we will turn to them for help in taking on some of the charges. You can find their full takes here and here.
The ThinkProgress list of charges is probably the most extensive, comprising no less than 12 different charges. Here is our assessment of each:
Charge #1: Ryan voted to add $6.8 trillion to the deficit, which means he’s not a fiscal hawk.
Posted at 05:42 AM in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Brochure from 1961 with basic advice about Social Security cards (pages 1 and 4) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Reynolds starts by noting that the basic elements of seniors’ savings:
"...interest rates on bonds, CDs and money market accounts are at historic lows. Money markets are down 0.35% and CD’s are 0.90%. Stocks are lower than they were five years ago."
The University of Tennessee law professor then posits this: Years ago, when seniors could accrue 5% on their savings, a $360,000 portfolio of CDs would garner $18,000 a year in interest, which amounted to $1500 a month. Combined with a Social Seurity payment that was roughly equivalent, the total would be $36,000 a year, $3,000 a month.
But in the current economy, that 5% becomes 0.9%, which means instead of receiving $18,000 a year, the total becomes $3,240 per year, or about $270 a month. Add the same $1,500 a month from Social Security, and the senior is now living on a mere $1,770 a month – just $21,240 a year. That's almost cutting their income in half. MORE>>>>>>>>>
Posted at 05:35 AM in Economy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Wilders:Luctor et Emergo (Photo credit: Roel Wijnants)
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - Israel's leading rabbi has warned Dutch populist politician Geert Wilders that his party's support for a ban of ritual slaughter of animals in the Netherlands is "anti-Semitic" and could drive away the country's Jewish community.
Wilders rose to prominence in the Netherlands denouncing the growing influence of Islam in the West, calling for a ban against Muslim immigrants, a halt to the construction of mosques and a ban on Muslim face-veils.
Some of his most outspoken supporters are in the conservative, pro-Israeli movement in the United States. Wilders calls himself Israel's "greatest friend" and has also proposed creating a national Dutch holiday to commemorate the victims of the Auschwitz concentration camp.
In a letter to Wilders on Tuesday, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters on Wednesday, Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger called on Wilders' Freedom Party to stop backing a ban on ritual slaughter. More>>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted at 05:33 PM in The Beast is Rising in Europe | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
![]() |
| Image |
Posted at 11:12 AM in Big Brother is Watching | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted at 10:46 AM in Big Brother is Watching | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
English: Osama bin Laden interviewed for Daily Pakistan in 1997; behind him on the wall is an AK-47 carbine. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
WASHINGTON (AP) — A firsthand account of the Navy SEAL raid that killed Osama bin Laden contradicts previous accounts by administration officials, raising questions as to whether the terror mastermind presented a clear threat when SEALs first fired upon him.
Bin Laden apparently was hit in the head when he looked out of his bedroom door into the top-floor hallway of his compound as SEALs rushed up a narrow stairwell in his direction, according to former Navy SEAL Matt Bissonnette, writing under the pseudonym Mark Owen in “No Easy Day.” The book is to be published next week by Penguin Group (USA)’s Dutton imprint.
Bissonnette says he was directly behind a “point man” going up the stairs. “Less than five steps” from top of the stairs, he heard “suppressed” gunfire: “BOP. BOP.” The point man had seen a “man peeking out of the door” on the right side of the hallway.
The author writes that bin Laden ducked back into his bedroom and the SEALs followed, only to find the terrorist crumpled on the floor in a pool of blood with a hole visible on the right side of his head and two women wailing over his body.
Bissonnette says the point man pulled the two women out of the way and shoved them into a corner and he and the other SEALs trained their guns’ laser sites on bin Laden’s still-twitching body, shooting him several times until he lay motionless. The SEALs later found two weapons stored by the doorway, untouched, the author said.
In the account related by administration officials after the raid in Pakistan, the SEALs shot bin Laden only after he ducked back into the bedroom because they assumed he might be reaching for a weapon.
White House spokesman Tommy Vietor would not comment on the apparent contradiction late Tuesday. But he said in an email, “As President Obama said on the night that justice was brought to Osama bin Laden, ‘We give thanks for the men who carried out this operation, for they exemplify the professionalism, patriotism and unparalleled courage of those who serve our country.’” More>>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted at 10:01 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Fascism Anyone? The 14 Defining Characteristics of Fascism by Dr. Lawrence Britt (Photo credit: watchingfrogsboil)
Posted at 09:58 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
For anyone who’s ever seen Gingrich engage in a heated debate, you can probably guess how this one ends.
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Posted at 07:43 AM in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Researchers found persistent users of marijuana, who started smoking it at
school, had lower IQ scores as adults.
They were also significantly more likely to have attention and memory problems in later life, than their peers who abstained.
Furthermore, those who started as teenagers and used it heavily, but quit as adults, did not regain their full mental powers, found academics at King’s College London and Duke University in the US.
They looked at data from over 1,000 people from Dunedin in New Zealand, who have been followed through their lives since being born in 1972 or 1973.
Participants were asked about cannabis usage when they were 18, 21, 26, 32 and 38. Their IQ was tested at 13 and 38. In addition, each nominated a close friend or family member, who was asked about attention and memory problems. More>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted at 06:23 AM in Your Health Today | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted at 04:19 AM in America in Prophecy, American's fight for America!, Big Brother is Watching, Defend the Bill of Rights and Constitution | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Democratic National Committee is raising a number of eyebrows after announcing that it will be hosting Islamic “Jumah” prayers for two hours on the Friday of its convention, soon after denying a Catholic cardinal’s request to say a prayer at the same event.
Their jummah (group) prayer is…about empowering their Islamist and MB sympathetic groups into the very fabric of the political system so that Americans become anesthetized. We need American Muslims to speak up and marginalize these radicals. The DNC needs to understand and reject them because of their radical history and ideas.
The mosque of Jibril Hough, mentioned by Dr. Jasser, is owned by the North American Islamic Trust, which was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial as one of the entities “who are and/or were members of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.”
Posted at 09:55 PM in America in Prophecy, American's fight for America!, Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
, member of the United States House of Representatives. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
By Jane M. Orient, M.D. From WND.COM
All decent people, including U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akin, agree that forcible rape is a heinous crime. Almost all would agree that illegitimate (false) accusations of rape occur – there’s the case of the Duke lacrosse players, for example.
All reasonable people, including Todd Akin, agree that pregnancy can result from forcible rape – but there is scientific disagreement on how likely it is.
A 1988 textbook, the second edition of “Human Sex and Sexuality” by Edwin B. Steen and James H. Price, estimates a 2 percent pregnancy rate. A 2012 textbook, “Comprehensive Gynecology,” 6th edition, gives an estimate of between 2 percent and 5 percent and states that “in the experience of most sexual assault centers, the chance of pregnancy occurring is quite low.” Estimates depend on flawed methods, with inevitable biases. An experiment to give an accurate figure is, of course, impossible. And does the estimate really matter to the woman who has been raped? Either she gets pregnant, or she doesn’t.
Is the risk of pregnancy lower with forcible rape, and if so, why? Off the cuff, Todd Akin gave a layman’s restatement of the point made by some pro-life physicians that the female body has some defense mechanisms against pregnancy in cases of rape.
The process of fertilization, implantation and maintenance of pregnancy is an intricate one, highly dependent on hormonal signals. Stress is conceded to make miscarriage more likely by disrupting the hormonal milieu. What could be more stressful than a forcible rape?
The intensity of the media outrage against Akin’s remark shows that this is not a scientific dispute about numbers, or the definition of “really rare.” Medical science is being replaced by political demagoguery about the issue of rape.
Rape clearly involves a forcible penetration of a woman’s body, without her consent, almost always by a man. It is painful and causes harm – not just physical injury but often lifelong, serious emotional distress: flashbacks, nightmares, anxiety, depression, difficulty forming normal relationships and even guilt.
Starting from one extreme, some radical feminists appear to believe that most if not all sex involving a man and a woman is a rape. The man is always the perpetrator, and the woman, a victim. Clearly, there are activities that are not forcible rape and do not involve the same emotional reaction, but are still not legitimate. These would include statutory rape, “date rape” and seduction. To suggest that a woman ‘s dress or behavior might in some cases have contributed is, of course, unacceptable.
At the other extreme, radical Muslims appear to believe that rape rarely if ever occurs, and that all non-marital contact between a man and a woman is illegitimate and the fault of the temptress. From the fury directed at Akin, you’d think he had advocated Shariah law and “honor” killings.
Then there’s the question of what to do if rape leads to pregnancy. Should there be a death penalty for rape? In the U.S., few advocate executing the rapist. Under Shariah, the rape victim might be executed, at least if she is not pregnant. But what about the rapist’s baby?
What happens in an abortion? A woman’s body is penetrated by instruments, usually in the hands of a man. The woman will have signed a consent form – but all too often because she felt she had “no choice.” The procedure is painful and bloody. Occasionally, serious physical injury occurs, sometimes even causing death of the mother. Judging from the million or so postings on the nonjudgmental website afterabortion.com, long-term emotional consequences are not uncommon, whatever official medical publications might say.
This procedure is almost always “legitimate” (legal) in the U.S. by order of the U.S. Supreme Court. It is the most common elective surgical procedure. We have lost as much as one-third of our younger generation because of it. The vast majority of Americans have been touched by it in some way. Of course it is emotional and divisive.
Politicians who claim to be pro-life are often adamant about preserving an exception for rape or incest. This exception is a fig leaf over the reality of what an abortion is. Coming too close to The Question is feared to jeopardize the chance to gain political power.
Akin’s phrasing became a convenient pretext for raising a disproportionate clamor as a diversion from the real problem. Those politicians and commentators who are calling for Akin’s head have signaled where their priorities lie.
Posted at 09:41 PM in Current Affairs, Your Health Today | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
English: Global map of male circumcision prevalence at country level, as of December 2006. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
(CBSNEWS) — The health benefits from male circumcision outweigh the risks, says the American Academy of Pediatrics in its latest guidelines on the controversial procedure published Monday.
In its first policy statement on the subject since 1999, which was later reaffirmed in 2005, the academy stops short of recommending routine circumcision for males, but adds that based on the current evidence, insurers should cover its costs.
The group’s previous stance said the procedure can prevent bladder infections and sexually transmitted diseases like HIV/AIDS, but also carried potential downsides like reduced sensation and infection.
Posted at 09:36 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
A more practical way to determine the diversity of the immune response would be to estimate the number of vaccines to which a child could respond at one time…. each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10, 000 vaccines at any one time. [1]The status accorded to him by the pharmaceutical and medical fields permits him to influence the opinions and practice of lower rung physicians regarding vaccine exemptions. Unfortunately, even doctors will simply believe the “expert”[2] without bothering to go and check their own medical literature to see if the self-proclaimed expertise has a solid scientific foundation. Research shows that when people listen to the expert, the part of their brains that is capable of independent thought goes to sleep.[3]
Posted at 09:18 PM in American's fight for America!, Big Brother is Watching, Defend the Bill of Rights and Constitution | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Logo of the United States Federal Communications Commission(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The Federal Communications Commission is eyeing a proposal to tax broadband Internet service.
The move would funnel money to the Connect America Fund, a subsidy the agency created last year to expand Internet access.
The FCC issued a request for comments on the proposal in April. Dozens of companies and trade associations have weighed in, but the issue has largely flown under the public's radar.
Posted at 05:34 AM in Big Brother is Watching, Web/Tech, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted at 10:51 PM in Sports/RACERAP | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted at 10:29 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Last week, TheBlaze gave you a behind-the-scenes look at Jeff Foxworthy’s “American Bible Challenge” television show on GSN (formerly Game Show Network).
On Thursday, the much-anticipated program premiered — and with great fanfare. While there was initial speculation surrounding whether “American Bible Challenge” would be a major success or a monumental failure, the network said on Friday that the show debuted as GSN’s number one program of all time.
GSN announced in a press release that the premiere episode of “American Bible Challenge” brought in 2.3 million total viewers for the night — the largest in its 17-year history. The show was so popular that it outperformed GSN’s previous record holder by over a half a million viewers.
America, a heavily-Christian nation, is clearly friendly to Bible-based content. This very well may be what drove the show’s initial success. Mixing the world’s most popular book with a game show format — and adding in Foxworthy as a host — has, thus far, proven a recipe for success. MORE>>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted at 07:49 AM in Current Affairs, Television/Radio | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The memo laid out a list of instructions for President Nixon, among which was the tragic task of calling the 'widows-to-be' to express condolences and then to deliver a moving and thoughtful speech to the United States and ultimately the watching world.
The memo prepared for President Richard Nixon in the event that the Apollo 11 Moon mission had gone terribly wrong
Posted at 07:25 AM in A History Lesson | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Image via CrunchBase
Posted at 07:22 AM in Web/Tech, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted at 07:16 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted at 10:06 AM in The Rest of the Story... | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The 26-year-old former Marine detained for making controversial Facebook posts is back at home at last. However, the fight to figure out exactly what happened — and what may be happening all across the country — has just begun.
Brandon Raub was scooped up in Richmond, Va. by federal and local law enforcement officials on Aug. 16 for making anti-government Facebook posts referring to “revolution” and statements that questioned the official story behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks, said John Whitehead, Raub’s lead attorney and president of the Rutherford Institute. He was then sentenced to up to 30 days in a psychiatric facility on Aug. 20 — no trial, no arrest warrant, no charges filed. He was finally released on Thursday.
“They are doing it under a law in Virginia, a civil commitment law” Whitehead told TheBlaze in an exclusive interview. And there are similar laws in other states all over the United States, he explained. However, according to Va. Code § 37.2-808, the statute in question, a person can be civilly committed if a magistrate judge has probable cause that any person:
Whitehead doesn’t believe his client meets any of the criteria needed for a civil commitment and argues Raub is anything but “mentally ill.” He says they haven‘t seen the psychiatric institute’s so-called “evaluations” but his legal team plans on having Raub evaluated by an independent psychiatrist from the University of Virginia. More>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted at 06:12 AM in America in Prophecy, American's fight for America!, Defend the Bill of Rights and Constitution | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Image via CrunchBase
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A judge on Thursday ordered the release of a former Marine who was detained for psychiatric evaluation after posting strident anti-government messages on Facebook.
Prince George County Circuit Judge W. Allan Sharrett said at the end of a one-hour hearing that the involuntary commitment order issued by a magistrate against Brandon J. Raub was invalid because it contained no allegation or basis to hold him, according to the head of a civil liberties organization that represented the 26-year-old veteran.
"This is a great victory," Rutherford Institute executive director John Whitehead said. "He's a good human being. He just got caught in some weird bureaucratic meanderings and the judge recognized that there's really no true facts to hold this man in a psychiatric ward."
Raub's family was expected to pick him up from the Salem Veterans Affairs Medical Center later Thursday. His mother, Cathleen Thomas, did not immediately return a voicemail message.
Raub, who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, was taken into custody Aug. 16 after being questioned by Chesterfield County police and federal agents about his Facebook posts. The FBI said the interview was prompted by complaints from people who read his ominous posts, including some that spoke of a pending revolution. One said "a day of reckoning" was coming, and another said: "Sharpen my axe; I'm here to sever heads."
Onlookers shot a video of Raub being led away from his home in handcuffs and posted it on You Tube, fueling a groundswell of support for the veteran and criticism that the government was trampling on his free-speech rights. The Charlottesville-based Rutherford Institute came to his defense, characterizing the government's actions as those of a police state. Raub was not charged with a crime.
"Brandon Raub was arrested with no warning, targeted for doing nothing more than speaking out against the government, detained against his will, and isolated from his family, friends and attorneys," Whitehead said. "These are the kinds of things that take place in totalitarian societies. Today, at least, Judge Allan Sharrett proved that justice can still prevail in America."
He called Raub's release a victory for the First Amendment.
"People a have right to go on Facebook or the Internet (and) say things that people might not agree with, "Whitehead said. "But that doesn't mean they're crazy or should be incarcerated for it."
Raub initially was taken the John Randolph Medical Center in Hopewell, where he was held over the weekend for a preliminary evaluation. After a hearing Monday, another judge ordered Raub detained for an additional month and transferred him to the Salem VA hospital.
Thursday's hearing was expected to be limited to Raub's objection to the transfer, so Whitehead said Sharrett's decision came as a surprise.
"The petition is so devoid of any factual allegations that it could not be reasonably expected to give rise to a case or controversy," the order says.
___
Associated Press Writer Michael Felberbaum contributed to this report.
Posted at 05:58 AM in Big Brother is Watching | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)





Recent Comments